The old adage, “Don’t throw the baby out with the bath
water,” apparently originated after the medieval bath practices. To conserve resources, families would bathe infrequently
drawing each time one tub of water. The
father would bathe first, followed by the mother, and on through the children,
finishing with the baby. By the time the
poor infant was dipped in, the water must have become quite turbid, and if the
parent wasn’t careful, the baby might go out with the murky bath.
As with all adages having stood the test of time, this one
illustrates--rather graphically, I think—an all too common truth of human
nature. We have a tendency of answering
one set of extremes with an opposing and equally extreme set before we finally--usually
after considerable collateral damage—settle into a balanced view. An example of this on my mind of late is the
crucifix.
Most of the Protestants emerging from the reformation in the
16th century repudiated symbols such as the crucifix because they
were seen as idolatrous; they worried that people would worship the graven
images rather than the invisible Lord. I
confess that most of my life I have felt the same way; although I have a much
more liberal view about the graphic arts than members of some minor Christian
sects. When it came to the crucifix,
though, I was more concerned by its theology than it being a potential
idol. To me the resurrection of Christ
is pivotal to the Christian faith, and somehow this seemed to me more in
keeping with an unadorned cross than a crucifix. I’m having a change of heart on this; I'm beginning
to wonder if I may have thrown the baby out with the bath water.
Certainly, the resurrection is essential to our faith. But the resurrection would have been
meaningless had Jesus not suffered and died the particular death He did; His
was no ordinary death; Jesus died into death by experiencing for us complete
separation from God. Because Jesus was
perfect both in humanity and divinity, such death had no hold on Him; God
raised Christ to a life transfigured both physically and spiritually from the
life we live now; Jesus’ resurrection was not a mere resuscitation as with
Lazarus, who would die again—even though Lazarus’ resurrection was a type of
what we who trust in King Jesus will have through Him.
We have no clue of the suffering Jesus experienced in our
stead. The beatings, scourging, taunts, and
jeers our Lord endured, and the pain he suffered from being nailed to the cross
through his wrists and feet were horrible beyond most imaginations. But what set the terror and torment Jesus
endured outside any human experience was His complete separation from God who
is the source of life. We have no
reference point for such suffering. For
this reason it has drifted into mere abstraction for us, with debilitating
effects.
As our understanding of the cost Christ paid for us to gain
access to God’s eternal kingdom dwindles, I’m afraid we find it more difficult
to be the suffering servants our Lord calls us to be in the present world. As we lose sight of the suffering component
of being a kingdom dweller, we become more fixated on the rewards of being in
the kingdom; and this results all too often in complacency, or worse, sin.
Saint Paul clearly explains in Romans 12 what our proper response should be:
“(1) Therefore, I urge you, Brothers [fellow believers] ,
through the tender mercies of God, yield your bodies as living sacrifices, holy
[and] well pleasing to God—your reasonable divine service. (2) And don’t conform to
this age, but be transformed (metamorphosed) by the renewing of [your] mind, so
you can ascertain what is the good, well pleasing, and perfect will of God.” [my
translation]
What are these tender mercies of which Paul speaks? Are they not captured in the “therefore”
beginning this passage? Yes: there is
God reaching out to us in mercy that we might see our sinfulness and repent
(Rom 2); and there is God’s faithfulness to His covenant promise through Christ’s
faithfulness on the cross, with the certainty of the kingdom for all who put
their trust—who walk by faith--in King Jesus (Rom 3,4); and there is forgiveness
of sins, peace, and the love of God filling us through His Holy Spirit in this
kingdom (Rom 5); and there is life in Christ because He lives (Rom 6); and
there is power through His Holy Spirit living in us to please God, and the certainty
of God’s faithfulness in the final vindication of His kingdom dwellers and the
restoration of all creation (Rom. 7,8).
We have a great and sure hope in the kingdom of God, but that hope
demands a response. And the response is
sacrifice.
All of those tender mercies should lead us to the conclusion
of our sacrifice because to be a kingdom dweller with Christ forever demands we
be transformed; only when we are fully transformed can we share in the Divine nature
and finally perfectly know and therefore conform completely to the will of God. And this transformation will entail
suffering, but suffering we can be certain will attain its objective—our transformation;
this is the certainty we have as kingdom dwellers through faith in King Jesus.
The trouble comes when we see this transformation happening
purely by osmosis, as if we are simply passive recipients. But that is not what Paul said. We must in response to all that God has
accomplished through Jesus the Christ seek to present ourselves as living
sacrifices, which means we make daily, even minute by minute decisions to
change away from the standards and paradigms of the present age and into conformity
with the will of God. The Holy Spirit
identifies these needed changes in us, He empowers us to make those changes,
but we must choose to obey Him; this is what it means to be a living
sacrifice. There’s more. If we fail to obey him, He will remind us of
this, too; and if we repent, we are forgiven.
But again, repentance is another aspect of being a living
sacrifice. It is also what Jesus meant
by us needing to exert all of our effort to enter the kingdom through the
narrow gate. Many people will believe
that transformation is simply a matter of association with Jesus and doctrines
and concepts about Jesus; they will be disappointed in the end because only
through striving to be living sacrifices by faith in King Jesus do we truly
enter His kingdom and therefore salvation.
So I ask again, how can we be living sacrifices if we are desensitized to the horrific sacrifice that made God’s kingdom open to
us? I think it’s nearly impossible
because without a deep sense of Christ’s suffering we so easily slip into a
perspective of “it’s all about me” instead of “it’s all about Christ”. For this reason Christ broke bread and shared
the chalice of wine with His disciples and commanded us to carry on the same practice until He returns. Christ knew
we needed to be reminded regularly of the cost that was paid for our
redemption. For this reason, too, I
think it is good to have a crucifix in plain sight to remind us what it means
to be a living sacrifice and keep us awake to the entreaties of the Holy Spirit
and so be living sacrifices.
1 comments:
It is good to be reminded of Christ's sacrifice in our place but I think there is a deeper truth. Only Christ could have atoned for my sins! Even if I could somehow be crucified for my sins it still would not be enough - only the perfect Lamb was good enough to wipe out my sins! Only God could have done it! So maybe a crucifix is a better reminder of this truth. An empty cross might imply that anyone could have atoned for my sins...
Post a Comment